Skip to main content

EDITORIAL: Voice of China

Ne News
24 March 2018

As people in the West knows, China is about to launch a "super-broadcaster" called "Voice of China", with some broadcasters (including SBS here in Australia) will be monitoring the content of the new international broadcaster (https://tvtonight.com.au/2018/03/sbs-to-monitor-bulletins-from-chinas-new-super-broadcaster.html). But the question is this: If broadcasters in the West wants to monitor international broadcasters such as Voice of China (as well as Iran's Press TV and Russia's Russia Today), shouldn't we be monitoring international broadcasters such as the Voice of America? Or Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty?

It is worth noting that stations such as Voice of America, as well as affiliates such as Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty are not allowed to be broadcasted in the United States of America because it is viewed as propaganda. That's right, Voice of America and its affiliates such as Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty is considered propaganda according to Washington, and therefore not to be broadcasted into the United States of America. And guess what? There is no monitoring of Voice of America and its affiliates such as Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty in Western countries. But the United States of America cracks down on Al Jazerra and Russia Today (both forced to register as foreign agents), but Israeli media is NOT REQUIRED TO REGISTER AS A FOREIGN AGENT.

And while Voice of China may end up being propaganda to the equal of Voice of America, it is worth noting that many countries broadcast material (or propaganda) internationally, and it is not unique to China or the United States of America (or Iran or Russia or United Kingdom or even Israel). That is why when news such as this comes up, we need to look at what other countries are doing and we would find out that what China is doing with Voice of China is no different to Voice of America or other international broadcasts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trojan Horses and Color Revolutions: The Role of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED)

William Blum William Blum 7 August 2017 Image: Award winning author William Blum This article is a chapter from  Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower  by William Blum published in 2005. How many Americans could identify the National Endowment for Democracy? An organization which often does exactly the opposite of what its name implies. The NED was set up in the early 1980s under President Reagan in the wake of all the negative revelations about the CIA in the second half of the 1970s. The latter was a remarkable period. Spurred by Watergate – the Church committee of the Senate, the Pike committee of the House, and the Rockefeller Commission, created by the president, were all busy investigating the CIA. Seemingly every other day there was a new headline about the discovery of some awful thing, even criminal conduct, the CIA had been mixed up in for years. The Agency was getting an exceedingly bad name, and it was causing the powers-th...
Post a Comment
Read more

CIA Backed Color Revolutions

F. William Engdahl New Eastern Outlook 1 October 2017 Many readers likely never heard the name of the remarkable Serbia-born political operator named  Srđa Popović . Yet he and his organization, CANVAS, have played a lead role in most every CIA-backed Color Revolution since he led the toppling of Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic in 2000, at least fifty according to last count. Now he has turned his sights on Hungary and Hungary’s popular and defiant Prime Minister Victor Orban . On September 8, the professional regime-change specialist Srđa Popović came to Budapest and joined with the anti-Orban opposition groups in front of the Hungarian Parliament. It‘s clear that Popović was not in town to promote his Hungarian book on nonviolent regime change but rather to give aid to the anti-Orban parties before Hungarian elections in spring of 2018. Many in Hungary smell the oily hand of Hungarian-born regime-change financier George Soros behind the Popović appe...
Post a Comment
Read more

EDITORIAL: 14 Defining Characteristics of Fascism

Ne News 7 April 2017 At the moment, there are concerns worldwide of moves towards fascism, and in particular a fascist world government that will be the centrepiece of the New World Order. However, the good news is that it is falling apart with the United Kingdom leaving the European Union (which is essentially the Fourth Reich, following the blueprint done by IG Farben during the Third Reich of Nazi Germany). However, it should be noted that work on this editorial started just a couple of days before Brexit was made official. A few years back, Dr. Lawrence Britt analysed the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia) and several Latin American regimes (most notably Pinochet in Chile). There were fourteen defining characters (which are indicated in bold with comments in normal text). 1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other parap...
Post a Comment
Read more