
New Eastern Outlook
12 October 2017
Media platforms either directly funded
by the United States government or by their political proxies in
Thailand, including US-funded Prachatai and Khao Sod English, have begun
investing increasing amounts of energy into fueling a currently
non-existent sectarian divide in Thai society.
They are concentrating their efforts in promoting the activities of a small anti-Muslim
movement in Thailand’s northeast region often referred to as Issan.
Issan – it is no coincidence – is also the epicenter of previous US
efforts to divide and overthrow the political order of Thailand via
their proxy Thaksin Shinawatra, his Pheu Thai Party, and his
ultra-violent street front, the United Front for Democracy Against
Dictatorship (UDD or “red shirts”). Shinawatra and his political proxies
were ousted from power in 2014 by a swift and peaceful military coup.
Today, temples affiliated with Shinawatra’s political network are
turning from a tried and tired, primarily class-based narrative, to one
targeting Thailand’s second largest religion – Islam, in hopes of
dividing and destroying Thai society along sectarian lines.
From northern cities like Chiang Mai to
the northeast in provinces like Khon Kaen, suspiciously identical
movements, with identical tactics, organized across social media
platforms like Facebook are protesting Mosques, calling for specific
acts of violence against Muslims, and using the same sort of factual and
intellectually dishonest rhetoric peddled by veteran Western
Islamophobes used to fuel the West’s global campaign of divide, destroy,
and conquer everywhere from the US and Europe itself, to Libya, Syria,
Iraq, Afghanistan, and more recently, Myanmar and the Philippines in
Southeast Asia.
Tools of Empire: Divide and Conquer
Myanmar, which borders Thailand, currently finds itself at the apex of nationalist and racist-driven violence targeting its primarily Muslim Rohingya ethnic minority.
Groups of supposed “Buddhists” who form a more deeply rooted version of
what the US and its proxies are trying to create in Thailand, were used
to both create a deep sectarian divide where once there was
coexistence, and to help put the US and European-funded political
network of Aung San Suu Kyi and her National League for Democracy (NLD)
party into power.
The humanitarian crisis created in
Myanmar serves several functions for the US and its European partners
who have meticulously cultivated it over the course of several decades.
First, it allows the West to
continuously hold significant leverage over the current government – one
who at any moment may be tempted to break away from its decades-long
Western sponsors and collaborate with a more local, sustainable, and
constructive partner like China.
Second, because the Rohingya crisis is
highly localized to Myanmar’s western state of Rakhine, it also presents
a highly controlled conflict the US can use to introduce foreign-funded
terrorism, and in turn, create a pretext for Western
“counter-terrorism” assistance in the form of US and European troops,
military assets, and even bases on the ground.
A small contingent of Saudi-funded and
directed militants has already been introduced into Myanmar’s ongoing
crisis and will likely be expanded until US military “assistance” and
thus the first stage in establishing a permanent military presence in
Myanmar can be justified.
This would fulfill a long-term goal the
United States has sought to achieve in Southeast Asia – the permanent
positioning of US military assets in a nation directly bordering China.
A similar scenario is unfolding in the
Philippines – a nation that was decisively shifting away from Washington
– a one time colonial power over the Philippines – in favor of closer
and more constructive ties with Beijing. The nation is now faced with a
sudden surge in foreign-funded terrorists – a surge so significant,
militants managed to take over the southern city of Marawi resulting in
full-scale military operations including airstrikes in order to retake
it.
Amid the manufactured crisis featuring
terrorists sponsored by the United States’ closest Persian Gulf allies –
specifically Saudi Arabia – the US found itself with the perfect
pretext to reassert itself militarily and geopolitically over an
increasingly independent Philippines.
The Daily Beast in its article, “The Philippines Is Destroying the City of Marawi to Save It From ISIS,”
would attempt to portray the US-Saudi engineered crisis and subsequent
pretext for the US military’s expanded role in the Philippines as more
ironic and coincidental than part of a cynical plan, claiming:
The Mautes have pledged allegiance to the so-called Islamic State, and use many of the tactics that the terror group honed in years of conflict in Iraq and Syria.Despite vehement antagonism toward the U.S. and its military expressed by Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte back in December, after the Mautes moved on Marawi in May, The New York Times reported U.S. Special Operations Forces were here as advisers supporting Philippine operations in June.
The Philippines represents the future of
Myanmar once the crisis there reaches critical mass. For Thailand, the
downward spiral of both the Philippines and Myanmar represents its own
future should it allow the sociopolitical rot of sectarian divide take
root at home.
For the US – it has sought for decades
to encircle and contain China along multiple fronts. This includes
across Southeast Asia where US policymakers envision a united front
composed of US-backed client states used to box China in – or a series
of failed and dysfunctional states that prevent China from developing
any beneficial ties with its neighbors to the south.
Considering the success the US is having
in the Philippines and Myanmar regarding its use of terrorism and
reactionary sectarian division, it is logical that signs of US efforts
in Thailand to do likewise are now appearing.
How the US and its Proxies Seek a Sectarian Divide in Thailand
Muslims and Buddhists have coexisted in Thailand for centuries, with Thai Muslims an integral component of Thailand’s history and cultural fabric.
Halal restaurants stand side-by-side Thai and Thai-Chinese cuisine,
including those serving pork, in markets across the country. Mosques
stand side-by-side with Buddhist temples. Buddhists and Muslims work
side-by-side in businesses big and small nationwide.
While Thailand has a violent insurgency
raging in its southernmost Muslim-majority provinces, of Thailand’s 7.5
million Muslims, only 1.4 reside in the deep south. The conflict is also
seen as being primarily political, with militants targeting both
Buddhists and Muslims in pursuit of their separatist goals. The rest
live scattered across the country, and with significant communities
coexisting in the capital of Bangkok itself.
For most Thais, the notion of
Islamophobia is another facet of intolerance associated with a corrosive
and declining Western culture – not Thai. Yet there are still fertile
grounds of profound ignorance, gullibility, poor education and lacking
economic prospects that make a fraction of the population still
vulnerable to otherwise childish, crass propaganda seeking to divide and
destroy Thai tolerance, unity, and culture – primarily among the
dwindling support base of US proxy Thaksin Shinawatra.
Khao Sod – an unabashedly pro-US,
pro-Shinawatra newspaper – recently published an article titled, “Rising
Islamophobia in Thailand Irrational and Dangerous Scholars,” written by
veteran pro-West commentator Pravit Rojanaphruk, which would claim:
After Muslims in Khon Kaen registered a converted home as their place of worship – the northeast province’s seventh such venue – a local Buddhist group cited terrorism in its petition asking the governor to deny it.
The article continues by stating:
Last week, a Thai monk who has called for mosques to be destroyed in revenge for Buddhist deaths in the Deep South was seized by the military and flown to Bangkok to be forcibly expelled from the order.Pages such as No Mosques in Bueng Kan mix stories of violence in the Deep South with anodyne news stories involving Thai Muslims and toxic internet conspiracy theories about Muslims plotting to displace non-Muslim populations worldwide. The comments are filled with Muslim-bashing messages in Thai.
And while the article appears at first
to be laying the ground work to unequivocally condemn calls for specific
acts of violence, bigotry, and hate speech, it adds an essential caveat
– one used by the United States and its front of faux-rights advocates
worldwide to shield both terrorists it sponsors, and reactionary fronts
it encourages to divide and destroy nations.
The article states – in regards to the
“monk” who called for the destruction of mosques, who was detained and
defrocked by the current Thai government – that:
Ekkarin said the junta’s detention and defrocking of radical anti-Islam monk Apichat Punnajanatho last week was wrong despite the hate preached by the monk because it resorted to using special power of the junta by detaining the monk at military camps first instead of going through the proper channel of having the Sangha Order investigates the matter. This, Ekkarin added, could lead to resentment by some Buddhists, particularly his supporters, and backfire.
The article, along with US-funded media
front, Prachatai, appear to condemn the Thai government for its
zero-tolerance stance on terrorsitic speech, bigotry, and hate.
As the US and its network of media
fronts around the world have done elsewhere, it is expected that
attempts by the Thai government to stifle manufactured sectarian
division will be systematically condemned by Western-funded fronts as
violations of “human rights” and in particular, violations of “free
speech.”
Prachatai – a supposed “independent media platform” entirely funded by the US government –
published its own article regarding Punnajanatho and his calls to burn
down mosques titled, “Buddhist authorities to defrock monks with
‘inappropriate’ online behaviour.”
In it, systematic complaints about the
Thai government’s interference with Buddhism are made, in an apparent
attempt to call government intervention inappropriate and unwarranted.
For the US-funded scribes at Prachatai, Thailand’s best course of action
appears to be to let the rot of sectarian division spread under the
auspices of Western-style “free speech,” just as it has in neighboring
Myanmar.
Yelling Fire in a Crowded Theater is not Free Speech
In even the most liberal nations on
Earth, threats of specific harm against others or their property is
considered a crime. Threats of death can be punished under US law with
up to 20 years or more in prison. Likewise, deceiving people –
particularly in a manner that causes physical harm – is also illegal and
not protected under free speech. The classic “yelling fire in a crowded
theater” example illustrates the very real harm intentionally deceitful
words have and why it is not protected by free speech.
Similarly, networks suspiciously overlaying US-proxy Thaksin Shinawatra’s political networks,
buried deep within his former political strongholds making specific
threats of violence toward Thailand’s Muslim communities is not “free
speech.” It is a crime and it must be punished swiftly and severely.
Likewise, these networks propagating
elementary lies about Islam in general, and about Thai Muslims more
specifically, are designed to create social division and discord that
will inevitably and intentionally lead to violence – as similar lies
have done everywhere from across the West itself to neighboring Myanmar.
It is the equivalent of “yelling fire in a crowded theater” with the
specific goal of provoking dangerous and unwarranted hysteria, chaos,
division, and bodily harm to those subjected to these lies.
US-funded media fronts attempting to
frame this reality in any other way – particularly in a manner meant to
hinder the government from addressing it before it spirals out of
control – is merely another example of how the US and its proxies hide
their self-serving political agendas behind the principles of human
rights advocacy rather than genuinely upholding them. They position
themselves as accessories to criminals using threats and lies to divide
and destroy peace and stability in Thailand, and should likewise be held
accountable.
The Other Side of the Divide
While US-funded organizations and
political networks run by their proxies in Thailand attempt to work one
side of this engineered sectarian divide, the Thai government must be
quick to spot and address US-Saudi attempts to spur similar lies,
deceptions, and provocations from the other side – among Muslim groups
or those posing as Muslims provided with foreign cash and directives to
help fulfill the lies being used to divide Thai society.
Just as is done in the US and Europe –
where Western governments fund and perpetuate both terrorists and
anti-Islam movements to create a sustainable strategy of tension between
both, they seek to likewise create a self-feeding crisis in Thailand
where eventually staged provocations on both sides transform into real
violence fueled by reprisals and growing distrust among previously
coexisting communities.
Thailand and other nations facing
foreign-funded attempts to divide their society must take a proactive
stance on exposing these efforts through intelligence operations and
national media that serve national interests, fostering national unity,
and creating clear and effective laws to unambiguously define and punish
threats and hate speech – especially speech specifically designed to
divide society and create violence.
Failing
to stop this sectarian divide from swallowing Southeast Asia may make
the difference between a prosperous and peaceful future for the region,
or perpetual violence and division as the West has successfully
maintained in the Middle East since the end of World War 1.
Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.
Source: https://journal-neo.org/2017/10/12/how-the-west-is-trying-to-recreate-myanmars-crisis-in-thailand/
Comments
Post a Comment