Anthony Bellchambers
Global Research
13 April 2016

Netanyahu has continued the
so-called official policy of ‘Nuclear Ambiguity’ that conveniently
enables the Israeli state to have built and maintained the world’s only
undeclared nuclear weapons arsenal that is estimated by American
scientists to hold up to a maximum of 400 nuclear warheads – sufficient
to destroy the whole of the Middle East and most of Europe.
The State of Israel is one
of the only UN member states to refuse to ratify the NPT
(Non-Proliferation Treaty) to which all 28 members of the EU are
signatories in addition to the United States, China and Russia. Israel
is now estimated to be the 3rd most powerful nuclear state in
the world, but the only one that is undeclared and therefore not
subject to any report or inspection by the IAEA (International Atomic
Energy Agency) of the UN. This raises urgent concerns regarding global
security and criticism of its covert nuclear policies that apparently
have the support of a lobby-influenced US Congress.
The charge of
‘antisemitism’, raised by the Israeli government and its diplomatic
missions, on every available occasion, is an official strategy of
obfuscation designed to obtain exemption from international agreements
on warfare and civil rights, plus immunity from the International
Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague, a court that it refuses to
recognise. Another example of Israel’s intransigence is its
government’s refusal to ratify the Chemical and Biological Weapons
Conventions to which all EU member states and the US are
signatories. Yet, astonishingly, both the EU and the US continue to be
Israel’s primary trading partners apparently oblivious to the danger
inherent in allowing the sharing of national security systems with a
non-European, foreign state.
· Surely British national security is more important than bilateral trade with one particular state?
· Surely criticism of trading with an undeclared nuclear power and its potential for war cannot be termed ‘antiSemitic’?
· Surely it must be
obvious that European/British Jewry have nothing whatsoever to do with
violations of the human rights of 5m civilians in the Occupied
Palestinian Territories?
· Surely it cannot
be right to allow lobbyists for a Middle East state with a documented
reputation for warmongering and illegal expansion to influence British
politics?
Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/criticizing-nuclear-armed-israel-and-its-illegal-settlements-must-not-be-construed-as-antisemitism/5519965
Comments
Post a Comment