Shane Quinn
Global Research
12 August 2017
Global Research
12 August 2017

On February 2014, a United States-sponsored coup was initiated in the Ukraine in which President Viktor Yanukovych
was illegally ousted from power. (1) Over three years later, the putsch
has done nothing but plunge the Ukraine, a tortured country plundered
throughout modern history (by the West), into another abyss. In a 2015
interview with CNN, then US president Barack Obama openly confessed that “we had brokered a deal to transition power in Ukraine”.
Around 10,000
people have been killed in the time since, with the conflict generating
2.5 million refugees who relocated to Russia. The putsch led to Crimea’s
annexation a month after the coup, with a 96% vote in favour of joining the Russian Federation – the majority of Crimeans already considered themselves ethnic Russians. (2)
The new Western-backed government, led by billionaire Petro Poroshenko, has been riddled with corruption and sees meagre support from the Ukrainian people. (3) Just 1.9% fully
trust Poroshenko personally, according to an unreported survey
conducted in June. (4) Poroshenko’s dismal backing is hardly surprising
considering the disastrous economic conditions millions are enduring in
the country. What’s more, the 2014 coup has led to an unseemly rise in
far-right groups.
In contrast, the Russian president Vladimir Putin has an 87% approval
rating according to a poll also in June. (5) This makes Putin “one of
the most popular leaders in the world”, with even mainstream networks
like CNN reporting on his consistently high approval ratings.
Thinking
objectively one can quickly identify the enormous pretense at work
here. Picture the Western reaction had Russia performed a key role in,
say, toppling governments on the US border, in Canada or Mexico. What
would the superpower’s reaction be? To adopt CIA lingo, any efforts to
install pro-Russian governments on the US frontiers would be “terminated
with extreme prejudice”.
Examining Mexico’s case, it’s worth remembering that the US is illegally sitting
on half of its territory. (6) After the Mexican-American war in 1848,
the US stripped of Mexico lands that later became known as California,
Arizona, New Mexico, etc. This is already taking into account the
annexation of Texas from Mexico in 1845. Such huge land-grabs have been
wiped from memory, except from the minds of Mexicans that is.
The West has acted
with seeming abhorrence on what they deem as Russian interference in
eastern Ukraine, the majority of whose people view Russia positively.
One of the West’s principal goals in initiating the 2014 putsch, was to
integrate the Ukraine into NATO – a hostile, expansionist foreign entity
receiving three-quarters of its funding from Washington. George Kennan, former US Ambassador to the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, described NATO
enlargement as “a tragic mistake”. (7) Kennan later joined other
American statesman in penning an open letter to the White House
condemning NATO expansionism as “a policy error of historic
proportions”. To no avail.
NATO is simply one arm of American imperialism. Since 1945 the CIA, with US government and military support, has toppled numerous
foreign regimes and installed military dictatorships. (8) Around the
world, the US has violated international law at will. Right now, for
example, the US is conducting aggressive military exercises to
intimidate an isolated and threatened North Korea. There are almost
30,000 American troops in South Korea, and another 50,000 in another
client state slightly further east, Japan. On top of this is a
significant American air and naval presence in south-east Asia.
It seems reasonable
to query the presence of tens of thousands of US soldiers situated
11,000 km from Washington. It can be safely called imperialism. With
this state of thinking, US military personnel have no qualms about
telling China how to behave in
the South China Sea, or the East China Sea. (9) The problem being that
China is thousands of years old and difficult to intimidate. The West
might have reacted differently if, for example, Russia was rebuking
Japan for conducting exercises in the Sea of Japan.
US policy towards
North Korea can be put under the grill too. What right does the US have
to bully a poor, deprived country, and in doing so provoke inevitable
responses? North Korea has a duty to protect itself, seeing as it was
utterly levelled by the US Air Force during the seldom-mentioned Korean
War. This past aggression can largely explain why the North developed
nuclear weapons to begin with: as a deterrent against further invasion.
Under current circumstances, it seems certain Kim Jong-un
and company are glad they have their small nuclear arsenal. After all,
the US have never invaded a nuclear-armed country, just weak, vulnerable
ones like Vietnam, Iraq or Libya.
It
sends a dangerous message to the world: arm yourself with nuclear
warheads if you want security from US aggression. Yet, in the Western
mainstream, it is North Korea who are continuously portrayed as the
villains in all this. The main reason the US are maintaining a presence
in south-east Asia, is that it’s one of the richest energy
producing areas on earth. (10) To stall their long-declining power, and
thwart a rising China, the US wants desperately to retain a presence in
this region.
Switching
14,000 km westwards, the US is again inciting conflict in Venezuela, a
country with a long troubled history. As the superpower has lost much
influence in South America this century, the Trump administration are
supporting right-wing groups with the aim of removing president, Nicolas Maduro.
The US have imposed various sanctions on a country rich in oil
reserves, hence the superpower’s interest. The corporate media are
portraying the “dictator” Maduro as the antagonist, much as they did
with Cuban revolutionary leader Fidel Castro. US military figures like General H. R. McMaster have voiced concern
that democracy is being lost in Venezuela (and reported seriously it
appears). (11) As history portrays, American concern for democracy goes
down as one of the more grotesque myths mankind has ever conjured.
Shane Quinn is an honor graduate with journalism degree. She is interested in writing primarily on foreign affairs.
Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-sponsored-coups-and-regime-change-nato-expansionism-washington-interferes-globally-ukraine-mexico-korea-venezuela/5603633
Comments
Post a Comment