Tony Cartalucci
Land Destroyed Report
22 August 2017
The battle between the established unipolar “international order” dominated by Wall Street, Washington, and London and an emerging multipolar order appears fixated on Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and across the entirety of Asia. However, it extends to virtually every corner of the globe, from competition in the Arctic to politically-motivated controversies in Earth orbit.
The South American nation of Venezuela also seems far-removed from this ongoing competition engulfing the world’s hot spots in the Middle East, Central and Asia, but the fate of this besieged nation is directly linked to the that of the rest of the world, either contributing to an emerging multipolar world order, or providing sanctuary and legitimacy to the established unipolar order currently dominated by Wall Street, Washington, and London.
The nation has been the target of US-backed subversion for decades. The latest iteration of American interference began with the rise of Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez and a failed US-backed coup in 2002 organized to oust him and place a US-controlled client regime in power.
Venezuela’s “Opposition” are US-Backed Agitators
Many of those involved in the failed 2002 coup are now leading US-backed protesters in the streets in a bid to overthrow the government of President Nicolás Maduro, who succeeded Chavez after his death in 2013.
The opposition includes former presidential contender, Henrique Capriles Radonski, who heads Primero Justicia (Justice First) which was co-founded by Leopoldo Lopez and Julio Borges, who like Radonski, have been backed for nearly a decade by the US State Department.
Primero Justicia and the network of foreign-funded NGOs that support it have been recipients of both direct and indirect foreign support for at least just as long.
All three co-founders are US educated – Radonski having attended New York’s Columbia University (Spanish), Julio Borges attending Boston College and Oxford, and Leopoldo Lopez who attended the Harvard Kennedy School of Government (KSG), of which he is considered an alumni of.
The Harvard Kennedy School, which hosts the notorious Belfer Center, includes the following faculty and alumni of Lopez, co-founder of the current US-backed opposition in Venezuela:
John P. Holdren, Samantha Power, Lawrence Summers, Robert Zoellick, (all as faculty), as well as Ban Ki-Moon (’84), Paul Volcker (’51), Robert Kagan (’91), Bill O’Reilly (’96), Klaus Schwab (’67), and literally hundreds of senators, ambassadors, and administrators of Wall Street and London’s current global spanning international order.
Harvard’s Kennedy School of
Government (KSG) is one of several universities that form the
foundation of both creating corporate-financier driven international
policy, as well as cultivating legions of administrators to execute it.
This includes creating cadres of individuals to constitute Wall Street
and Washington’s client regimes around the world.
Venezuela’s Problem, Like Other Targeted States, is US Sedition, not “Socialism”
It is true that Venezuela
is deemed a “socialist” nation, and its policy of heavily centralizing
the economy has not only failed to alleviate the many longstanding
socioeconomic conflicts inflicting Venezuelan society, but has also
created an ample vector for Wall Street and Washington’s meddling.
By placing all of
Venezuela’s proverbial “eggs” in one centralized “basket,” the United
States – through the use of various well-honed geopolitical and
socioeconomic tools – has managed to knock that “basket” from the government in Caracas’ hands and is now using its well-funded and organized opposition to crush whatever “eggs” survived the fall.
Unfortunately for
Venezuela, the Western political landscape is so deeply rooted in blind,
poorly developed political ideology, practical geopolitical and
geostrategic analysis has been overlooked across both traditional and
alternative media platforms, and instead, many – including opponents of
US-backed regime change worldwide – have found themselves cheering on
what they believe is the self-inflicted collapse of the socialist
Venezuelan government at the hands of “free market” protesters.
In reality, they are
cheering on yet another episode of US-backed regime change, wrapped in a
protective layer of ideological, political, and economic rhetoric to
justify otherwise unjustifiable, extraterritorial meddling,
interference, chaos, division, and destruction.
Venezuela’s Place Within the Unipolar-Multipolar World
Depending on the ultimate fate of the Venezuelan government, the
success of US-backed proxies, and the ability of Venezuela to
reconstruct itself after decades of foreign-backed subversion, Venezuela
can either enhance or set back the emerging multipolar world order.Regardless of Venezuela’s fate if and when the government in Caracas is toppled, the US-led unipolar international order will benefit. The elimination of competition, even at the cost of creating a center of regional destabilization is considered favorable versus allowing a bastion of alternative socioeconomic and geopolitical power to persist. And in many ways, the creation of a regional center of destabilization may help the US create “synergies” between the chaos it is fostering in Venezuela and in neighboring South and Central American nations the US has likewise targeted for geopolitical coercion and/or regime change.
For Russia, China, other nations of BRICS, and even emerging economies across Southeast Asia and Central Asia, the loss of Venezuela as a means of counterbalance to US hegemony both in the region of the Americas and globally will allow the US to concentrate more resources toward remaining alternative centers of geopolitical and economic power it seeks to target.
This – not the nature of Venezuela’s “socialist” government – is the focus of US efforts and is what defines the consequences of either US success or failure regarding regime change in Caracas.
Any government, socialist or otherwise, operating outside of Wall Street, Washington, and London’s sphere of influence is a target. Competition, not ideology defines and drives Western foreign policy – and for those who oppose this policy – it must be practical geopolitical and geostrategic analysis that defines conclusions and courses of action – not the ideological debates the US itself is using as a pretext and as rhetorical cover to justify its latest regime-change project.
Venezuela may be geographically far removed from the focal point of the great unipolar-multipolar struggle, but understanding how it fits into conflicts raging in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and across Asia illustrates just how encompassing the “international order’s” reach and ambitions really are – and how deadly dangerous they are to global peace, security, and stability.
All images in this article are from the author.
Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/venezuela-regime-change-and-washingtons-battle-against-multipolarity/5605156
Comments
Post a Comment