Strategic Culture Foundation
19 January 2018
19 January 2018
This
past week saw a spate of international security alarms which underlines
the danger of the world stumbling into catastrophic war. Those alarms,
which were either false or hyped up, stem from a Cold War mentality.
Such a mentality is not only dangerous, it is also unacceptable in today’s world.
First,
we saw the US territory of Hawaii being put on full-scale alert over a
supposed incoming ballistic missile. The alarm turned out to be false.
There was no such incoming missile, but the entire population on the
Pacific island were put through 38 minutes of sheer torment.
A day after that incident, Japan’s air-raid system also put a similar false alert.
In both cases, it was assumed that the non-existent missiles had been fired from North Korea.
Meanwhile
in Europe, fighter jets from Belgium, the Netherlands and Britain – all
members of the US-led NATO alliance – were scrambled to intercept two
Russian warplanes. The Russian Ministry of Defense rejected claims that
its aircraft were acting “provocatively”, saying that the pair of
Russian Tu-160 bombers had at all times been flying in international
airspace on a routine exercise.
The
latter type of incident appears to be an increasing occurrence. Over
the past two months, British navy frigates have made a point of
“escorting” Russian warships navigating “near British territorial
waters”. Again, as with the air intercept incident this week, the
Russian Ministry said that its warships have at all times adhered to
international waters.
It
is not Russian aircraft or vessels that are being provocative. It is
British and other NATO states who are in effect trying to interdict
Russia’s legal right to use international airspace and maritime
territory.
Britain
in particular seems to be hamming up claims of “defending” its
territory from non-existing Russian threat. The irony here is that
Russia has had to contend in recent years with an increasing number of
NATO aircraft and naval vessels entering the Baltic and Black Sea
regions. But the Western news media say little about that, while
flagging up headlines about alleged Russian “provocations”.
This
alarmist situation whether in regard to Asia-Pacific or Europe is
deplorable. The volatile atmosphere leads to fear-mongering and runs the
risk of false alarms being raised. That, in turn, runs the risk of
misunderstandings and the very grave danger of a military response
escalating into conflict, or worse.
It
is incumbent on all to heed the concern expressed by former US Defense
Secretary William Perry, who served in the President Clinton
administration. Perry said recently that the world is now at greater
risk of a nuclear catastrophe than at any time during the former Cold
War.
This
fiendish predicament arises from a Cold War mentality maintained by
Washington and its NATO allies. That mentality perceives and portrays
the world in ideological terms of “us and them”, “free nations and
unfree nations”, “allies and enemies”. This antagonistic worldview is
essential for Washington upholding ambitions of a “unipolar world” under
its “leadership” or, more bluntly, dominance and hegemony.
Such
a worldview is essentially about one power and its NATO acolytes trying
to exert geopolitical control over others, rather than embracing the
reality and more viable arrangement of multilateralism. For unipolar
ambition, it is necessary to present the world as an adversarial
scenario. Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and other “non-conforming”
nations must be cast as “rivals”, “opponents”, “rogue nations”.
That,
in turn, leads to international relations becoming fraught with
adversarial agendas and belligerence. The relentless Russophobia in
Western official discourse based on groundless claims of Russian
interference in Western politics is typical of the inevitable hostility.
In short, the US and its NATO subordinates persist in a Cold War mindset in order to fulfill ambitions of unipolar control.
But
as Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov pointed out this week the
notion of a unipolar world is negated by the growing reality of a
multipolar international order. The rise of China’s economic power is
perhaps the clearest testimony.
As
long as Washington pursues this unacceptable ambition of dominance,
then the world will continue to be frustrated by antagonistic tensions.
International
relations must instead be conducted on the basis of equality under the
universal protection of law and sovereign rights. And diplomacy must be
the currency of relations.
There
can be no place for threats, ultimatums and unilateral use of military
power. The US-NATO summit in Vancouver this week where a small group of
nations assume the prerogative of issuing ultimatums to North Korea to
disarm unilaterally, rather than these nations embracing diplomacy to
resolve that crisis is typical of an anachronistic Cold War mentality.
It is counterproductive, futile and totally unacceptable.
That mentality is putting the world on a dangerous threshold where tensions and alarms are recklessly risking a catastrophe.
The anachronistic Cold War mindset must be decommissioned for a new political paradigm of democratic internationalism.
Comments
Post a Comment